Skip to main Content

Dematerialization = more options

Date
04 November 2008
Dematerialization = more options

How do we measure dematerialization? What is, for example, the overall impact of post vs. email?

We would evaluate the energy impacts based on the previous service minus what a new service can save plus the impact of the new service.

But what about the rebound effects? When we can communicate more easily, don't we do more printing of emails, or travel more to visit new clients we may never have found?

In spite of the possible rebound effects, dematerialization solutions should be encouraged because they give us options. If we decided we (as a society) wanted to significantly curb travel, it would be possible because we have other communications options like email or telephone.

For example, one UK company, ViaPost, is offering an alternative to sending letters in the UK which is cheaper and, according to their website, has 80% less impact.

Latest from Twitter

 

India – A low carbon leader

In this blog, expert commentators such as our India Director Krishnan Pallassana critically examine the political environment for domestic climate action as well as share updates from our Bijli program.


Changhua Wu: The Clean Revolution in China

Changhua Wu is our Greater China Director. Here she blogs about the policy, technology and behavior change that is driving China's Clean Revolution.

US Climate Policy

The Climate Group’s Head of US Policy, Evan Juska, and guests analyze the latest US climate policy developments and trends.

Jim Walker's Clean Revolution blog

The Clean Revolution

This blog has been archived.

Molly Web's SMART2020 blog

SMART 2020

This blog has been archived.

Robin Haycock's EV blog

Sustainable Mobility

This blog has been archived.